No Playpublished for calibration; the blended edge did not clear the staking threshold · see it on the Ledger
Our probability57.4%
Market probability53.4%
Our number at each sealThe sealed disagreement
Difference+4.0 ptsModel edge at the seal
The exact sealed values
Our probability
57.4%
Market probability
53.4%
Difference
+4.0 pts
Why this made the card
The raw disagreement is +4.0 pts: our 57.4% against the market’s 53.4% with the juice removed
The edge survives the blend into the market: -4.8% expected value a unit at -125
It did not clear the stake floor after doubt: published as a No Play, graded, never staked
A big raw disagreement is not automatically a bet. The market gets a vote: after our number is blended into the devigged consensus and charged for doubt, what is left has to carry a full unit. Here it did not, so the pick published as a No Play and is graded for calibration only.
Published and graded, never staked.
The golf case
revision 4, rank 4 of 714 priced sides this week; sealed at fanduel, the best major book (major books only, 2026-08-02); consensus of 2 books
The read as sealed, written before the gun and never edited after.
